
I’ve finally picked up a copy of Richard Hugo’s The Triggering Town. I’m halfway through it, and already my inner cynic admires Hugo’s “written in a sense of play” style. I prefer the realistic to the snooty, the humorous to the boring, the crazy to the sane.
Which is probably why I get along so well with the text.
Though for another thing, it’s concise. If you’re looking for a detailed analysis of the poetry writing process, go somewhere else, to another town where people devote soliloquies to meter and verbs. That isn’t to say either of those elements aren’t necessary or worthy of soliloquies but just that Hugo hovers over the town rather than banging down every house’s front door and barging inside. This work is more of an attitude than a study, or maybe the study of an attitude that enables poetry to be written.
Hugo says “to write a poem you must have a streak of arrogance…when you are writing you must assume that the next thing you put down belongs not for reasons of logic, good sense, or narrative development, but because you put it there.” I think that sums up everything you need to know about a poet in fifty words or less.
Which is probably why I get along so well with the text.
Though for another thing, it’s concise. If you’re looking for a detailed analysis of the poetry writing process, go somewhere else, to another town where people devote soliloquies to meter and verbs. That isn’t to say either of those elements aren’t necessary or worthy of soliloquies but just that Hugo hovers over the town rather than banging down every house’s front door and barging inside. This work is more of an attitude than a study, or maybe the study of an attitude that enables poetry to be written.
Hugo says “to write a poem you must have a streak of arrogance…when you are writing you must assume that the next thing you put down belongs not for reasons of logic, good sense, or narrative development, but because you put it there.” I think that sums up everything you need to know about a poet in fifty words or less.